iii. AUTHORISATION OF INFRINGEMENT Direct infringement (above) and authorisation of infringement are separate and distinct causes of action. (WEA International v Hainmex Corp (1987)) Authorisation to infringe may occur in the following instances: – Providing the means to infringe without a warning against copyright infringement amounts to an open invitation to infringe. (UNSW v Moorhouse (1975)) – If one is aware of likely infringement but fails to take any action to stop the infringement, this amounts to infringement by authorisation. (APRA v Jain (1990)) – Knowingly allowing others to infringe and failing to take any action against the infringement amounts to infringement by authorisation. (APRA v Metro on George (2004)) (Universal Music Australia v Cooper (2005)) Universal Music Australia v Sharman Licence Holdings (2005) (Wilcox J, FCA) – Sharman authorised infringement by users of its file-sharing software. – Sharman’s warnings to users were ineffective, as it could have adopted technical measures to curtail infringement, but it instead encouraged users to increase their file-sharing and, by criticising record companies, to ignore copyright constraints.
The most concise and updated Intellectual Property Law Study Notes for Australian Law Students.
Does not include Model Exams and Model Exam Answers.
(Click here to purchase the Notes & Model Exam Answers)
Approximately 19440 words over 37 pages. Prepared in 2022.